Is that true?
主題を明確に
よく言われる
本当か？
慣用句になっていないか？
右上の花が強すぎる
主題を明確に
OK、でもそれではただのスポットライトショットにならない？
右の闇から現れた顔面傷だらけの凶暴そうな男
気配を感じ振り向く男（主題）もその目の鋭さ尋常ではない…
その2者の緊張感こそが主題なんですけど....
やさぐれた花の写真はいかがなものか、とは言われないだろうけど
よく言われる
本当か？
慣用句になっていないか？
右上の花が強すぎる
主題を明確に
OK、でもそれではただのスポットライトショットにならない？
右の闇から現れた顔面傷だらけの凶暴そうな男
気配を感じ振り向く男（主題）もその目の鋭さ尋常ではない…
その2者の緊張感こそが主題なんですけど....
やさぐれた花の写真はいかがなものか、とは言われないだろうけど
Is That True?
“Make the subject clear.”
People say it all the time.
But is that really true?
But is that really true?
Hasn’t it become just another cliché?
“The flower in the upper right is too strong.”
“Make the subject clear.”
“Make the subject clear.”
OK.
But if I do that, doesn’t this become just another spotlight shot?
But if I do that, doesn’t this become just another spotlight shot?
Imagine this:
A man with a scarred, brutal face emerges from the darkness on the right.
Another man, sensing his presence, turns around.
He may be the “main subject,” but the sharpness in his eyes is anything but ordinary.
Another man, sensing his presence, turns around.
He may be the “main subject,” but the sharpness in his eyes is anything but ordinary.
The tension between those two figures —
that is the real subject.
that is the real subject.
So why not here?
No one would say,
“Is it really appropriate to photograph a flower that looks this rough and damaged?”
“Is it really appropriate to photograph a flower that looks this rough and damaged?”
Would they?
